Atiku’s Legacy and the Cost of Political Amnesia

 

In a thought-provoking opinion piece titled "Atiku, Not Tinubu, Is the Wrecking Ball," veteran journalist Azu Ishiekwene challenges prevailing narratives surrounding Nigeria's political and economic challenges. Published in Premium Times, Ishiekwene argues that while President Bola Ahmed Tinubu faces significant criticism for his administration's policies, it is former Vice President Atiku Abubakar who poses a more substantial threat to Nigeria's stability.​

Ishiekwene begins by acknowledging the hardships Nigerians have endured under Tinubu's leadership, including rising inflation, food insecurity, and currency devaluation. He notes that these issues have led to widespread discontent and protests. However, he contends that Tinubu's decisive actions, such as removing the petrol subsidy and attempting to unify exchange rates, were necessary steps to address long-standing economic problems. These reforms, though painful in the short term, aim to lay the foundation for a more sustainable economy.

In contrast, Ishiekwene criticizes Atiku Abubakar for what he perceives as opportunistic behavior. He accuses Atiku of exploiting the nation's challenges to undermine Tinubu's administration, rather than offering constructive solutions. Ishiekwene points out that Atiku's policy proposals, such as a gradual approach to subsidy removal and foreign exchange reforms, have been tested in the past without yielding significant results. He argues that Atiku's suggestions lack innovation and fail to address the complexities of Nigeria's economic landscape.

Furthermore, Ishiekwene highlights Atiku's history as Vice President, during which he was involved in the privatization of public assets. He suggests that this period was marked by mismanagement and corruption, leading to skepticism about Atiku's current critiques of the government's economic policies. Ishiekwene implies that Atiku's past actions have contributed to the very issues he now condemns.​

The article also touches on the political dynamics within Nigeria, emphasizing the importance of unity and constructive criticism. Ishiekwene warns against divisive tactics that prioritize personal ambition over national interest. He calls for a focus on collaborative efforts to address the country's challenges, rather than engaging in political brinkmanship that could further destabilize the nation.

In conclusion, Azu Ishiekwene's piece presents a compelling argument that redirects scrutiny from President Tinubu to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. While acknowledging the difficulties faced under the current administration, Ishiekwene urges Nigerians to consider the broader context and the roles played by various political figures in shaping the nation's trajectory. His analysis serves as a call for thoughtful engagement and responsible leadership in navigating Nigeria's complex political and economic landscape.​